Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Elkins's avatar

HAROLD, well done, totally fabulous heartfelt reaction to the book & also totally weird mashup of Musil's mechanically engineered text with the multiple apostrophes of Sterne. It's almost as if Sterne was hanging around in the novel, taking notes (I imagine on a tablet, and also I imagine handwritten, with optional OCR and lots of it all-caps and multiply underlined—something for a future post?).

My own engagement with Musil is different. I'm fascinated in particular by two things.

(1) The fact that it's unfinished, and under this heading especially the moment when Musil may have known that it always would be, or more accurately, the moment the text begins to announce it. If you hadn't known it was unfinished, when would you have sensed it? When would you have started to think about it in every chapter? And — a separate aspect of this question — what does it mean that there are, I think, 11,000 pages in the Nachlass (the notes)? If I'm remembering right, there are only a few texts that address that material in detail. When does incipient form give way to hopeless formlessness? Wittgenstein's Nachlass, which is all online, is something like 16,000 pages (again I'm guessing, from memory): it can be searched, but what would the cumulative effect be, on a reader, of experiencing such enormous wastelands of fragments and repetitions?

(2) I also think of Musil as the exemplar of the "novel-essay." This is a kind of novel that began in the late 19th century. Its hallmark is that the plot is intermittently put on pause while the author has the principal narrator exposit some point — in love, politics, mathematics, hydrology, etc. The principal scholar on this subject is Stefano Ercolino; he has two books on the subject. I'm fascinated by the "novel-essay" as an ongoing problem in the novel. Consider Proust as a contemporaneous example; the narrator permits himself long languorous pauses in the already stilled narrative to explore all sorts of issues. The growth of essays within novels could, in theory, wither the idea of plot in the name of writing that comes from, and basically remains in, nonfiction. Or fast forward to postmodernism: Pynchon is full of "essays," and so is Gaddis, and so is Barth. Gass's essays are like "The Tunnel," and it's like a conglomeration of his essays. I think about this a lot in my writing, and I try to be extreme about it when I do, in order to dramatize the difference between the modes, and not pretend they can be mixed to a uniform gray, which is how I think of Richard Powers.

Of course you're exactly right to think about love and incest, and there's also the despairing criticism of Austrian politics. These are just my own interests.

Adelaide's avatar

Omg the twin Pierrot outfits

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?